How to read the chart
The gold line is the owner's home equity. The navy line is the renter's invested money. Where the gold line crosses above navy, buying has caught up.
The renter invests the down payment, the buying costs and every month's saving over rent. The owner pays EMI plus upkeep. No tax benefits (Section 24 or 80C) and no tax on investment returns are included, which would favour buying slightly and renting slightly.
75 lakh
25 thousand
Renting comes out ahead by
₹63,81,724
On these numbers renting stays ahead for the whole period.
A fair comparison counts the same money on both sides. If you buy, you put down a deposit and pay EMI and upkeep. If you rent, you pay rent and still have the deposit, plus whatever you would have spent above rent. The honest version invests all that and compares net worth after some years.
Take a ₹75 lakh flat in a metro. A 20% down payment is ₹15 lakh and the loan is ₹60 lakh at 8.75% for 20 years, an EMI of about ₹53,000. A similar flat might rent for ₹25,000. The renter has ₹28,000 a month and a ₹15 lakh deposit to invest. At 10% over 15 years, that portfolio grows large. The owner holds a flat that, at 5% growth, is worth about ₹1.56 crore, minus whatever loan remains.
Which way it falls depends mostly on three things: the rent-to-price ratio, how fast the home appreciates, and what your investments earn. High rent against price favours buying. High investment returns favour renting. Staying a long time favours buying, because buying costs of 6% or so need years to recover.
None of this counts the non-financial side. A home you own gives you stability, no rent hikes and no landlord. A rented flat gives you the freedom to move for a job. Run a few cases, change the growth and return assumptions, and treat the result as a range, not a verdict.
Buy: value − loan balance. Rent: portfolio grown at the investment returnRead the full methodologyFound an error? Contact us
Each example is worked out by the same code as the calculator above.
The gold line is the owner's home equity. The navy line is the renter's invested money. Where the gold line crosses above navy, buying has caught up.
The frame shows the tool only.
<iframe src="/embed/rent-vs-buy" title="Rent vs buy" width="100%" height="720" style="border:0;max-width:42rem" loading="lazy"></iframe>In many big cities rent is only 2 to 3% of the home's value a year, while the loan costs 8.5% or more. That tilts the maths towards renting, unless prices grow fast. Wanting a home of your own is a fair reason to buy anyway.
Long-run averages in most Indian cities are around 4 to 7% a year, with big differences by city and by decade. Try a low and a high figure.
No. Home loan interest and principal deductions under the old regime favour buying a little, while tax on investment gains favours it too.
A large down payment invested at 10% can beat a home growing at 5%. Buying wins when prices rise quickly or you stay long enough for the loan to be paid down.